Nepal Courts Struggle to Recover from Janakpur Movement

Nepal’s court system is still reeling from the aftermath of the Janakpur Movement, which saw widespread arson attacks on courthouses and destruction of case files.

The Supreme Court, in particular, has been severely affected, with a significant backlog of cases. As of Ashar 29, 2083, there were 27,467 cases pending at the Supreme Court, with only 29% of cases being disposed of in the fiscal year 2082/83.

The court’s ability to function has been hindered by the loss of case files and the destruction of its IT system. The court has been working to rebuild its infrastructure and restore its services, but the process has been slow.

The impact of the Janakpur Movement has been felt across the country, with courts at all levels struggling to cope with the backlog of cases. The Kathmandu District Court, for example, has a staggering 26,445 cases pending, with each judge handling an average of over 1,000 cases.

Challenges in Implementing Court Verdicts

Implementing court verdicts has also become a significant challenge. According to the Kathmandu District Court, only 65% of verdicts have been implemented, with the remaining cases pending due to various reasons such as non-cooperation from the parties involved, lack of correct addresses, and failure to meet deadlines.

The court has been working to address these issues, but the process has been slow. The court has also been facing challenges in collecting fines and compensation, with a significant amount of money still pending.

Efforts to Clear Backlog

The Supreme Court has been working to clear the backlog of cases, with a focus on disposing of old cases. The court has also been working to improve its IT system and infrastructure, with the aim of increasing efficiency and reducing the backlog of cases.

Despite the challenges, the court remains committed to delivering justice to the people of Nepal. The court has been working to ensure that justice is delivered in a fair and timely manner, and that the rights of all parties involved are protected.